tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20374666.post6839983167366101385..comments2024-03-29T10:34:48.821-04:00Comments on Stockbee: Stocks to watchPradeep Bondehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16750002566366368685noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20374666.post-58988111071167829552007-04-02T13:23:00.000-04:002007-04-02T13:23:00.000-04:00I look at 65 day growth not 65 day MA. On a 100% p...I look at 65 day growth not 65 day MA. On a 100% plus move along the way stock will have weakness/consolidation for 65 days and then resume move. So by selecting such stocks you are catching probable start of new up trend.<BR/>While relative strength on longer time frame is good, on shorter time frame it leads to reversal. So one improves ones chances by timing entry on longer term relative strength play with short (65 day) lower relative strength.Pradeep Bondehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16750002566366368685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20374666.post-87084006201021681182007-04-02T10:38:00.000-04:002007-04-02T10:38:00.000-04:00Pradeep,Just wanted to get your thoughts on CALM, ...Pradeep,<BR/>Just wanted to get your thoughts on CALM, on how would you position yourself if at all. I noticed it had amazing earnings, and was trying to anticipate the move staying on sidelines. I understand why you give importance to the 65-day avg and it is infact overextended on it and wouldn't prolly show up on your screens. However, wouldn't the 65-day be extended on most of the stocks making 200-300-400% moves? Unless you got in on the 1st breakout, how would you time your entry lets say after a 100% move. Or would that basically be not a tradale equity in your scheme of things?Paulinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09442259319866656377noreply@blogger.com